Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Porcine Health Management

dc.contributor.authorHollard, Romain
dc.contributor.authorFeberwee, Anneke
dc.contributor.authorCatania, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorDudek, Katarzyna
dc.contributor.authorBokma, Jade
dc.contributor.authorManso-Silván, Lucía
dc.contributor.authorBrowning, Glenn
dc.contributor.authorMaes, Dominiek
dc.contributor.authorGautier-Bouchardon, Anne V.
dc.contributor.authorHolstege, Manon
dc.contributor.authorTardy, Florence
dc.contributor.authorWiegel, Jeanine
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Claire A.M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-02T08:13:12Z
dc.date.available2026-10-02T08:13:12Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifierhttps://dspace.piwet.pulawy.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/989
dc.identifier.issn2055-5660
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40813-026-00522-4
dc.description.abstractMycoplasma infections pose a significant challenge in swine production because of their economic impact and the difficulties associated with diagnosis and treatment. Antimicrobials are often the only available option for combating mycoplasmoses despite reports of resistance to several molecules and the frequent chronic nature of infections, which can reduce treatment efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the use of antimicrobials against swine mycoplasmoses through an international field survey and to review the relevant scientific literature and regulatory recommendations. The survey was led by the MyMIC network, whose main objective is to standardise antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods for livestock mycoplasmas. The responses of 118 swine veterinarians across 25 countries were analysed. No significant variations in practices were observed between countries. Macrolides, tetracyclines, and pleuromutilins were the most prescribed antimicrobial classes (used in more than 40%, 20% and 5% of clinical cases, respectively), which is consistent with current recommendations. Additional diagnosis with laboratory-based methods was commonly reported, with only 2.5% of veterinarians indicating that they never used it. However, AST was not commonly performed; only 30% of respondents reported requesting it in more than half of the cases. Ineffective or critically important antibiotics, such as beta-lactams or fluoroquinolones, were occasionally prescribed (approximately 1% for each). Occasional deviations from the recommended dosages were also noted. These findings raise concerns regarding resistance selection and potential treatment failures. Our results underscore the need for enhanced diagnosis, especially AST, and for a wider dissemination and adoption of treatment guidelines to support the sustainable management of swine health. By developing and promoting harmonised AST protocols and enabling objective, data-driven prescriptions, MyMIC plays a key role in strengthening communication between swine veterinarians and diagnostic laboratories, thereby supporting international antimicrobial stewardship.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.subjectswineen_US
dc.subjectmycoplasmasen_US
dc.subjectveterinarianen_US
dc.subjectAntimicrobial useen_US
dc.subjectSwine, Mycoplasmas, Antimicrobial use, Veterinarian, Surveyen_US
dc.titleVeterinary antimicrobials practices for swine mycoplasmoses: a field survey and comparison with scientific and regulatory recommendationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitation2026 Vol. 12, article number 50
dcterms.titlePorcine Health Management
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-026-00522-4


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord